22, 2004 after the bar notified him he would not likely be approved on moral character grounds. According to court filings, Glass passed the New York Bar Examination in 2000 and applied for admission to the bar in July 2002. Glass ‘s legal struggle to join the bar goes back almost a decade. The question before the California Supreme Court is the 39-year-old Glass's current moral state, and whether he has sufficiently rehabilitated himself to practice law today. That verdict was delivered long ago you can read the eye-popping details in Buzz Bissinger’s September 1998 Vanity Fairfeature. The legal argument under debate in California isn't whether Glass made stuff up willy-nilly in his journalism. Penenberg tipped the New Republic off about the fishiness of Glass's piece about “ Jukt Micronics,” and all of his journalistic work was scrutinized for lies. (According to court documents, Glass settled a lawsuit filed against him by D.A.R.E., the subject of his Rolling Stone piece, for $25,000.) The scam ended in May 1998 after reporting and inquires from Forbes Digital Tool editor Adam L. Most of these tainted stories appeared in The New Republic, where he worked, but others were published in Policy Review, Harper's, George, and Rolling Stone. These pieces described incidents that never took place and attributed quotations to made-up people. But Glass was an exceptional case: He gained worldwide notoriety in 1998 after dozens of stories he wrote while working as a Washington journalist in the mid-to-late 1990s were discovered to be fabricated. If Stephen Glass were an ordinary applicant, the California Committee of Bar Examiners would have readily approved the graduate of Georgetown University law school (magna cum laude, 2000) after he passed the California bar exam and applied for admittance. Glass’s California application has now traveled to the top of the legal food chain, where the state Supreme Court agreed in November agreed to hear arguments on Glass’s moral fitness to become a member of the State Bar of California. There is no journalist that could ever get away with a production like his today in the technological age.That question-first posed in 2002 when Glass applied for admittance to the New York State Bar Association-moved to California in 2007, when Glass applied to join its bar. While it is a story that can be seen as heartbreaking, he only brought it upon himself. He lacked every bit of journalistic ethics and was dealt with accordingly. What Stephen Glass did essentially was committing the seven deadly sins of journalism in one extensive, deceitful event. Zuckerberg was the only one to offer Glass an interview out of 100 employers. Steve was eventually hired by Paul Zuckerberg, a Georgetown graduate who found Stephen’s history to be incredible. Since his time at New Republic, Glass had been desperately trying to become a lawyer which he ended up not passing the bar because he was not deemed fit for the job. The article describes an interview with Stephen Glass and a former co-worker who still works at New Republic that took place roughly 10 years after the movie came out. At a time before the complexity of today’s internet, Glass pulled off his work that would not be possible to do today. In his carelessness, he practically brought New Republic to the ground.Īccording to the movie, Shattered Glass, Steve cooked, or formulated, at least 27 of 39 stories he wrote for New Republic over time that spanned two editors. He was the head of the fact-checking department so Glass could seamlessly bypass his editor the majority of the time. However he was the mastermind behind the largest fraud scandal in journalistic history. He specialized in human interest stories with national prowess in which he seemed to nail a great, unusual story every time. Stephen Glass was a prominent writer for New Republic magazine, mostly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |